Software Development Company Site
Software Development Company Site
Hello,Please review my new site: http://www.dyamar.com
How does it look? Is it good?
P.S. If anybody needs software development services, do not hesitate to contact us ;-)
Thanks,
Dymytriy.
Re: Software Development Company Site
Hello,My point of view is that every new product should be shown to the public at very early stages. That's my expeirence ;-) Earlier you see issue, faster they will be fixed.
Regarding HTML bug... if there are issues, there are made by Drupal team or by template designer.
But I will check for thanks,
Mostly I am interested in design overview. But you told that it looks great.
Thank you.
Re: Software Development Company Site
CubeSquare wrote:dymytriy,
Again, this is very sophisticated. But this has issues that softTuna did not, namely validation. It was a mistake to ask for clients with a site that does not validate. The site's design is great. Validate and finish the site. Don't jump the gun. Even with softTuna, because the site was not sticky, asking for clients is premature.
-CubeSquare
What kind of validation do you mean?
Re: Software Development Company Site
CubeSquare wrote:HTML
-CubeSquare
Thank you, just wanted to confirm....
Re: Software Development Company Site
Hello,As I wrote before, this is clean Drupal installation. We did not develop/code site.
And, my opinon, there may not be errors. I trust Drupal. But the validator may be too old
and does not support HTML5, RDF, etc.
Regards,
Re: Software Development Company Site
CubeSquare wrote:Hello dymytriy,
What happened, I thought you had this down to a mad science. 49 errors and 19 warnings? And then you ask, validate what? I really like this design. Much better than softTuna. But softTuna only had 5 errors due to not closing </p> tags. It's normal for folks to come up with errors, but we expect more from you. Only this time, even though you have a better product, you neglect to validate. I don't get it.
-CubeSquare
Please try this link: http://validator.w3.org
If HTML5 is enabled there, it shows only 15 errors.
And again, it's written there that the HTML5 validator is experimental, it means that there may not be errors
Drupal is very good.
Re: Software Development Company Site
Hello,Sorry, but I totally don't understand why the critics is to heavy.
With HTML5 validator there 15 errors. And there is no proof that there are no errors in validator it self.
From your words it sounds like the Java language has to be validated with the C++ validator.
HTML5 is the new standard, and it's obvious that some software, including non commercial will not support it.
And again, this site is raw code from Drupal.org. We did not modify it.
Drupal.org has 100 000 visitors per months. And people trust it.
If thoose 100k trust it, I will trust too and will build my site by using Drupal.
Regards,
Dymytriy.
Re: Software Development Company Site
Hello,http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=html. ... ne&group=0
And this is very weird, isn't it?
Regards,
Re: Software Development Company Site
i will not talk about validation because its compulsory to validate your website specially if you are providing any I.T services :)but the look and feel and the navigation system is very good and i really like it.
and it should have blog of company link/option to know more about company.
Re: Software Development Company Site
Hello,Please look at this validation: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=softt ... Fa&group=0
It produces only 2 errors, only only because ALT tag is not.
We've seens those error because the wrong validator was used.
Drupal uses XHTML+RFDa.
Funny thing, this is a bug in validator itself :-) it cannot detect valid doctype!